
Moving beyond the courtroom. A comprehensive look at Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, and Collaborative Law for separating families.
Legal Review: This comprehensive guide was reviewed by Deepa Tailor, Senior Family Lawyer, to ensure accuracy with the Divorce Act amendments regarding mandatory ADR consideration (2026).
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) encompasses all methods of resolving a family law dispute outside of a trial. While not strictly 'mandatory' in every single case, Ontario law now places a duty on parties and lawyers to consider and encourage ADR first. Courts may refuse to hear a case or penalize you with costs if you rush to litigation without attempting to settle via Mediation or Negotiation first.
Lawyer-to-lawyer negotiation. We exchange 'Offers to Settle' and letters. The most common and informal method.
A neutral third party helps you talk. Good for communication, but the mediator has no power to decide.
A 'No Court' contract. Lawyers and financial experts work together. If it fails, you must restart with new lawyers.
Private Court. You hire a judge to make a binding ruling. Faster than public court, but you pay the judge's hourly rate.
ADR assumes both parties can negotiate freely. It is NOT appropriate in all cases.
Amendments to the Divorce Act create a duty for parents to try to resolve matters through family dispute resolution mechanisms.
We are legally required to inform you of ADR options during our first meeting. We cannot just push for trial.
If you unreasonably refuse a mediation offer and insist on trial, a judge may order you to pay your ex-spouse's legal fees, even if you win on some issues.
Negotiation between spouses (Kitchen Table Settlement) is free, but risky. Lawyer-assisted Negotiation or Mediation is generally the most cost-effective legal route.

Senior Family Lawyer
Deepa Tailor is the founder of Tailor Law. She is a strong proponent of the ADR shift in Ontario law, helping families find durable solutions while avoiding the trauma of litigation.
View Full Bio